Madame Bovary’s Ovaries

Madame Bovary's OvariesI found Madame Bovary’s Ovaries, which I finished last night, to be a very entertaining and enlightening read. I will be the first one to admit that I never saw much of a connection between science and literature. Yes, I had often spun that yarn about how literature is essentially about the human condition, and how better to learn about ourselves than to study our literature, but I always saw this statement in terms of psychology, not biology. What David and Nanelle Barash accomplish is showing the reader how to look at literature through the lens of Darwinism. While I think the actions of some characters do fit patterns, there are others that seem to go against their evolutionary nature, and the Barashes are quick to note in their epilogue that this method of interpreting literature is but one of many.

In this book, the Barashes break down their dissection of literature into categories:

  • Othello and Other Angry Fellows: Male Sexual Jealousy
  • The Key to Jane Austen’s Heart: What Women Want and Why
  • How to Make Rhett Give a Damn: What Men Want and Why
  • Madame Bovary’s Ovaries: The Biology of Adultery
  • Wisdom from The Godfather: Kin Selection, or the Enduring Importance of Being Family
  • The Cinderella Syndrome: Regarding the Struggles of Stepchildren
  • On the Complaints of Portnoy, Caulfield, and Others: Parent-Offspring Conflict
  • Of Musketeers and Mice and Men and Wrath and Reciprocity and Friendship: In Steinbeck Country and Elsewhere

I do think that the authors make a convincing argument that long before Darwin even cooked up his Theory of Evolution, writers were creating characters that obeyed Darwin’s biological observations.

Of the chapters, I found the one on Reciprocity and Friendship the most difficult. I felt that it was in this chapter that the writers strained themselves the most to make what I felt were tenuous connections to biological instincts toward reciprocity. However, I found the chapters on adultery and what men and women want very enlightening. The chapter on stepchildren was also very interesting (and mentioned my favorite boy wizard).

In all, I would recommend this book highly to folks interested in either literature or science (or both), especially if they don’t see a connection between the two. I found the writers’ style engaging and very easy to follow, so those of us who haven’t been in a biology classroom in 20 years or so need not be intimidated by the prospect of scientific jargon. Cleary the writers’ goal was to bring an understanding of biology to the layman.

As much as I have become used to the notion of studying literature in order to understand the human condition, I found it interesting in this instance to study the human condition in order to understand literature.

The Power of Genealogy

Today has been a great day for me in terms of genealogy research.  I reconnected with Steve Cunningham, who descends from my great-great-grandfather Amos’s brother Charles Cunningham, and we shared some stories and photographs.

I was also thrilled to discover the family of my great-great-grandmother Stella Bowling Cunningham’s former fiancé, John William Tolleson.  I wrote about it on my genealogy blog.  Go check it out!

Making connections like these across the generations and getting glimpses of the lives of our ancestors is so exciting.

Named After

I am not named after anyone. I think my mother knew a girl named Dana in high school and liked the name. Incidentally, the story behind Sarah’s middle name is the same. There are two main schools of thought on naming children after others:

  1. Children deserve their own identities separate from that of relatives and should have a different name from all other family members.
  2. Naming children after family members, friends, or other people one admires is a way of honoring that person and connecting one’s child to the past.

While I see the point of proponents of position one, I tend toward position two. I think it is interesting to look at naming patterns in families, and it can be one way to help make connections. For instance, the given name “Martin” is so popular in Steve’s family, that when I ran into some Huffs who used the name “Martin” in the area where his grandfather was born in my genealogy research, I was fairly certain there was a connection. As it turns out, the name Martin has been in his family for at least 200 years. The earliest ancestor of his that I can find was Martin Hough, who was born about 1805. His grandson was named Samuel Martin Hough (and he changed the spelling of the last name to “Huff”). Samuel Martin’s grandson was Will Martin Huff, and Will Martin’s son was Ben Martin Huff. Ben Martin’s son Jack named one of his sons Martin. I’m sure each generation used the name to honor the person who had the name in the preceding generation. In other words, I believe that Steve’s uncle Jack named his son in honor of his father, not realizing the name Martin stretched back across eight generations.

I don’t think I have any names in my family like that, but there are cases in which relatives have been named for ancestors. My uncle is named for his grandfather. My aunt’s middle name is my grandfather’s first name. There are other names in my family that have some meaning, but do not honor an ancestor. My sister, for instance, was named after a character in the movie Dr. Zhivago. My mother was named for a girl that my grandfather thought was pretty.

Then there are the comic examples. My father was named after a cousin of his mother’s, who told her that he’d buy her a box of candy if she named my dad after him. That one doesn’t beat my school colleague’s mother naming her and her brother after the new monkeys at the zoo, but it makes me giggle.

My children’s names all have significance in that they are named after people or things that are important to me. Sarah’s name comes from Fleetwood Mac’s song “Sara”; however, I like the spelling with the “h” better, so I used that one (even thought the song doesn’t). Maggie is named for her grandmother, although I will admit I really wanted to name her Stella after my great-great-grandmother. Steve didn’t want to, though, because I guess he used to know a girl named Stella whom he disliked. Her name seems to fit her, and I can’t imagine her being something besides Maggie now. Dylan is named for both the poet Dylan Thomas and my father, which I suppose means he is (after a fashion) named thusly because my grandmother’s cousin bribed her with a box of candy.

My maternal grandfather was named for a book character. My paternal grandfather’s given name was changed (along with his surname) when he was adopted. I found that odd, as he was about nine when it happened. As far as I know, neither one of my grandmothers was named for anyone, but one of my cousin’s middle names is the same as my maternal grandmother’s middle name.

It seems it was the fashion in times past to name the older children after relatives. After the supply of relatives one felt like honoring dwindled (and people had 12 or 13 children), new names entered the family. I think this is the case with my great-great-grandfather Amos. His older brothers and sisters were named for grandparents, aunts, and uncles. He’s the earliest Amos in his family. Of course, I have six other people with some variation of Amos (either first or middle) in my family tree after him.

Then again, names seem to go in and out of fashion. I wonder how odd it will be to have older women named Kaylee and Madison instead of Margaret or Betty. I think some people don’t consider the fact that a name sounds somewhat juvenile when they name their children. The child will grow up and have to deal with that name. I also don’t understand why some folks give their child the diminutive form of the name. For instance, naming a child Bobby instead of Robert. If you name him Robert, you can call him Bobby when he’s little. When he grows up, he can use the more adult-sounding Robert.

Personally, I’ve always kind of liked my name. When I was little, I felt singled out because I was the only Dana in school, but as I grew, I met more Danas. That was the only reason I didn’t care for my name when I was little.

Where’d you get your name from? What do you think of it?

Back to School

As you may recall, Maggie started kindergarten this week.  Predictably, she is having trouble adjusting.  She didn’t do very well behavior-wise — she was “rolling on the floor,” “talking during instruction,” and “screaming in the halls.”  That sounds like Maggie.  She is stubborn, headstrong, and loud.  Hopefully we can work out the kinks as she gets used to school.  She has already told me that she’s had “enough school.”  But she does like her teacher, and she appears to have made friends.

My school does not resume until after Labor Day so that contractors can finish our new building.  In fact, we will not be conducting pre-planning in our new building.  I admit I am disappointed I won’t have time to decorate my room and get it ready, but we will be allowed to work from home, library, the old school, or even Starbucks if we want to in compensation (that is, as long as we have no meetings).

So far, Dylan hasn’t seemed bothered by the fact that Maggie is gone during the day, but I think once I go back (especially as he and Daddy will have to drive Maggie to school), he will start missing everyone.

That Feeling

I am going to attempt to describe something that is probably indescribable. Ever since I was a little girl, I have noticed a physical sensation in my throat. It feels kind of like a glow, like a little germ of happiness. It tickles a little. I get it for various reasons.

I first remember noticing when I was showing my friend Darcy my grandfather’s coin collection. I think then that I got it that time because I felt proud that the collection was so interesting. Might only have been interesting to me.

I have noticed as an adult that I most often get it when I am showing a student something that interests me and find they are interested, too. It sort of a “sharing” feeling, I guess.

I don’t just get it when I’m sharing something, and I don’t always get it each time I share something. I have noticed that I also get it when I feel proud, but not as often as I do when I’m sharing.

It’s the best feeling in the entire world. I don’t really know what it is, and I can’t manufacture the circumstances under which it happens, but when it does, I am usually able to sustain it as long as I like.

Anybody else know what I’m talking about? Anyone know what it is?

Girl Scouts

Girl Scout LogoNext week, I’m going to an organizational meeting for Girl Scouts.  I am going to try Maggie out in Daisies and see if she likes it.  They didn’t have Daisies when I was in Girl Scouts.  I started out in Brownies in second grade.  My school in first grade didn’t have a troop, so I was in Campfire Girls (Blue Birds).  When I was in second grade, I sold the most cookies in my troop.  I earned a Super Seller badge.  My troop leader ran off with the cookie money, but I flew up to Juniors and was placed in a new troop, so I guess I didn’t let this experience get me down.  I earned so many badges as a Junior that I couldn’t fit them on my sash and had to use a vest.  I still have it.  I quit Girl Scouts in sixth grade because I had convinced myself that I would be a first class geek if I stayed in through middle school.  I regret quitting and wish I had stayed in, now.

Sarah was in Daisies, and she seemed to enjoy it a lot.  We went camping with her troop at a Girl Scout camp, and it was a lot of fun.  We went fishing and Sarah caught a turtle.  She missed out on Brownies, and when I asked her as a fifth grader if she wanted to try to get into Juniors, she told me “I’d rather eat dirt.”  Apparently, she didn’t have fun at a Girl Scout camp her dad sent her to one summer.  Oh well.

We’ll see how Maggie likes it.  Come February (assuming Maggie likes it enough to stay in that long), let me know if you want cookies.  It would be kind of cool to have two Super Seller badges in the family.

Holes

HolesLast night I finished reading Louis Sachar’s children’s book Holes. My daughter had told me it was good, and I have been carefully avoiding the Disney movie based on the book so I could read it. I had heard glowing reviews. Daniel Radcliffe said, for instance, that he didn’t like reading much until he read this book and, of course, the Harry Potter series. I borrowed the book from a colleague (it belongs to her son). While I was in the hallway, a male student stopped me in and raved about the book. Hmm… I thought. This is a book boys love. I can’t tell you how hard it is to find books like that; in my experience as an educator, boys just do not read as much as girls do, and it is harder to find books they will like. If this were not a problem, then programs like this one wouldn’t be necessary.

That said, I found it a charming story. Stanley Yelnats has nothing but bad luck, and it’s all on account of his no-good-dirty-rotten-pig-stealing-great-great-grandfather, Elya Yelnats. Stanley is accused of stealing a pair of shoes; no one believes him when he tries to tell them they fell out of the sky. Stanley is presented with a choice. He can go to Camp Green Lake, a sort of juvenile work farm, or jail. Stanley picks Camp Green Lake.

Camp Green Lake has no lake. The guiding philosophy of those who run the camp is, “If you take a bad boy and make him dig a hole every day in the hot sun, it will turn him into a good boy.” So Stanley and the other “campers” dig holes, five feet deep and five feet wide in all directions. After a while, it becomes clear to Stanley that the camp’s warden has the boys dig holes because she’s looking for something.

The storyline is well-plotted and holds the reader’s interest. We are introduced to Stanley’s parents and learn about the Yelnats curse that prevents the family from catching a break. Along the way, we meet Stanley’s no-good-dirty-rotten-pig-stealing-great-great-grandfather and his poor great-grandfather, who was robbed by Kissin’ Kate Barlow. Stanley even meets the descendent of Madame Zeroni, who placed the curse on the Yelnats family, and is able to fulfill a destiny that four generations of his family have been oppressed under.

One thing I didn’t understand about the story was the character Mr. Pendanski, the camp counselor. He seems, on the one hand, sympathetic to the boys. He does a small part to make their lives a bit easier, and he shows them respect by addressing them by their given names instead of the nicknames they have all chosen or been assigned by the campers. Except for Zero. Mr. Pendanski treats Zero with nothing but contempt, and the reason why is never really brought to light or resolved. Zero is actually a pretty nice kid, and he has had the roughest life you can imagine, so it seems doubly hard to believe that a counselor would try to make it any rougher. I would have liked to have discovered the reason for Mr. Pendanski’s contempt for Zero.

Aside from this snag, I thought the story was great, and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Voting

I'm a Georgia VoterIf you don’t think voting in all elections is important, ask the residents of the 4th Congressional District in Georgia.

Thank God!

I watched her “concession” speech. I’m not sure I’d call it that. She sounded a bit more sane than I thought she would, and when she trotted out her notion that election fraud was responsible for her 17-percentage-point loss, I thought, “here she goes.”

I hope she stays gone this time.

I went down, took 10 minutes, and voted in the run-off, although I didn’t have the pleasure of voting out McKinney, as I have the distinct fortune of not living in her district. I heard on the news that some voters turned out to vote against her only to be upset to learn she was not their congresswoman.

Movable Type v. Word Press: Update

Since I dumped Movable Type for Word Press about six months ago, I have fallen in love with Word Press. It is so much easier to make changes to templates. It’s less clunky and takes up less room on the server. The themes are nicer looking than most MT stylesheets/templates I’ve come across. I have fewer problems with spam comments; I have not had a single spam comment post to my site, and a miniscule amount of them are even thrown into moderation, so I never have to see them.

Because Word Press is distributed under the GNU General Public License, users have adapted it and created all sorts of plugins for it. I have barely even begun to look at all the bells and whistles I can attach to my lean, mean, CMS machine. I’ve recommended it to others looking to blog. If you yourself are looking to blog, I do suggest Word Press; if you don’t have your own domain, try WordPress.com, who will host your blog (similar to Blogger/Blogspot). In fact, if you are able to migrate from Blospot to WordPress.com, I’d suggest it. Blogspot has been a huge target for comment spam. One of my favorite blogs was having such a problem with it that the owner will only allow commenters who have Blogger profiles to comment on their blogs. One of the reasons I ditched MT was because of TypeKey. It may have changed since, but with the last version I had, I couldn’t simply allow users I trusted to automatically post a comment; they had to either go into moderation with everyone else or login to TypeKey. I sympathize with those of you who don’t feel like registering with some (unknown) entity in order to comment on a blog. I actually resent it, so I understand why most of you all did not do so when I was using TypeKey.

I wouldn’t go back to MT unless something major happened at Word Press. Steve first suggested it when he had the opportunity to use it while writing for Blogs for Natalee about a year ago. I am a creature of habit, and I was reluctant to switch. Once I tried it, though, I was really happy with it. I have changed the look drastically several times with minimal fuss compared to changing templates with MT.

P.S. Is there anyone out there who wants me to implement Gravatar again?