Literature Carnival, Ninth Edition

I want to thank all of you for your submissions to this week’s carnival. A reminder that the Tenth Edition of the Literature Carnival will fall one day before William Shakespeare’s birthday. For the April 22 edition of the Carnival, please submit your Shakespeare-themed posts, and let me know if submissions received well before then should be saved for the Shakespeare edition.

In book reviews this week, we have Grrlscientist’s thoughts on Darwin: Discovering the Tree of Life at Living the Scientific Life, Jonathan Dresner’s review of The Apprentice by Lewis Libby at Frog in a Well and my own review of Lev Grossman’s Codex here at Much Madness is Divinest Sense.

Did you know the Internet had a patron saint?  Check out Sylvia’s series on St. Isidore of Seville starting with “Isidori Hispalensis Episcopi: Patron of the Internet” at Bookworm.

Tanya Abramovitch talks about her weekend reading in “Weight” over at the Library Girl.

Edward Champion reports that Joyce Carol Oates is “hang[ing] up the boots and giv[ing her] wrists a rest” at Edward Champion’s Return of the Reluctant.

I couldn’t resist posting this link to Austen Blog’s outing of Miami Heat guard Dwayne Wade as a Friend of Jane.  I want a poster for my classroom.

Just a reminder that the LitBlog Co-Op will be announcing the Spring 2006 Read This! selection a week from today.  Be sure to stop by and check it out.

David Weinberger of Joho the Blog is wondering how we sort our books.  Do piles count as sorting, I wonder?

Lucy Tartan takes a look at the divergent reading habits of men and women at Sorrow at Sills Bend.

OK, folks, see you in two weeks with the tenth edition devoted to William Shakespeare. Don’t forget to make your submissions for inclusion.

Waste of Time?

I must have missed this announcement. No doubt in the world that blog posts, comments, and message board posts have the potential to cause harm to others. I worry that just annoying someone has become illegal. If that sort of thing transferred into everyday life, most of us could think of at least one person a day who should be headed for jail. Co-workers who gives us rides to work, but then forget us and leave us stranded there. The guy who cuts us off on the Interstate. The guy with his blinker on for five miles. The loud kids at the restaurant. Etc.

In the case of this law, I suppose the implication is that it’s legal to annoy someone if you use your real name. My experience has been that almost no one who doesn’t like something I’ve have written and wants to leave a negative comment uses his/her real name. I had a few comments about posts I wrote about Marilou Braswell that were all anonymous and signed off with a dismissive, “God Bless!” (Being such an ass as to criticize Coach Braswell meant I must need God’s blessing, I suppose.) I deleted them because I don’t see a reason to give someone who isn’t brave enough to stand behind his/her words with a real name air time on my blog.

Then, too, there are instances when someone makes it a hobby to set up a blog and criticize someone. There are probably a few of these, but I’m most familiar with the one set up in mockery of my husband’s blog. I scratch my head over that, because I don’t understand what the point is. Why does this anonymous person care so much? It’s confusing to me, but then I suppose some people have copious amounts of time to waste on such fruitless endeavors. I think when these sorts of sites are not open to feedback or comments, then it is because the writers realize what a waste of time it is and are scared of being harassed in the manner in which he/she harasses others through this kind of activity. I should be less circumspect and link the blog, but 1) I don’t feel it needs even the paltry traffic I would deliver to justify its existence, and 2) I have no desire to be a target of his/her strangely obsessive and certainly venomous nastiness. As far as I’m concerned, if you have a beef with what my husband writes about, keep it between the two of you and leave me out.

I don’t know. I just think it’s weird to hide behind anonymity and expect to be taken seriously. It also makes it impossible to engage in dialogue because the footing is not equal. It’s kind of like the difference between a debate between two individuals in which each participant knows or knows of the other and some heckler in an audience who keeps screaming out, “You suck!” As much as I don’t get heckler comments, I really don’t get heckler blogs.

Literature Carnival, Eighth Edition

I want to thank all of you for your submissions to this week’s carnival. Before we peruse the selections, I want to, as we say here in the South, put a bug in your ear about something. The next Literature Carnival will take place on April 8, but the one after it falls one day before William Shakespeare’s birthday. For the April 22 edition of the Carnival, please submit your Shakespeare-themed posts, and let me know if submissions received well before then should be saved for the Shakespeare edition.

I always look forward to GrrlScientist’s submissions, especially her LabLit reviews. Read her review of Intuition by Allegra Goodman.

Ron Schuler probably didn’t know this about me when he submitted Prisoner Without Fingerprints — The Mystery of Thomas Malory, but I’m a huge King Arthur nut. The story of Sir Thomas Malory is almost as interesting as that of his famous legendary hero, and it is something I thoroughly enjoyed reading at Ron Schuler’s Parlour Tricks.

Margaret Atwood generated quite a buzz with her LongPen, which enables her to “meet and sign books for her fans all over the world from her own home.” It also generated some snark from “General Kang” at The Skwib.

One of the most interesting trends in blogging, perhaps (or perhaps not) originating with NaNoWriMo, is serial blogging — the publication of short stories or novels in serial format on a blog. I think this is one of the wonderful things about blogging — who needs to cater to an agent or a big publishing house when you can share your writing in your blog and reach your readers immediately? And what better way for agents and publishing houses to scout for talent? OUPblog submits part one of their serial blogging piece “Copycat.” (Yeah, I know, it isn’t exactly what I was talking about, as this piece was previously published, but you get the idea).

“The horror…” Heart of Darkness. Koranteng Ofosu-Amaah takes a look at the novel and the shadow it casts over Congo/African-related literature in his excellent post.

Ever get that “so many books, so little time” feeling? What do you do about it? Tanya Abramovitch at The Library Girl considers the options.

OK, folks, see you in two weeks with the ninth edition. Don’t forget to make your submissions for inclusion.

Old Writing

Steve is looking over his old journals.  In some ways, I am envious of the fact that he has them.  He can read what he was doing on March 12, 1986 (provided he wrote that day) and marvel over his dorkitude.  I kid, of course.  Or do I?

I kept a paper journal for a few years in high school.  I don’t know what ever became of it.  I sometimes I wish I had it now.  I distinctly remember taping the first penny minted in 1987 that I came across that year.  There were all kinds of things like that stuffed in there.

I don’t have that, but I do have online writing dating back to late June 2001.  There are reasons why I don’t want to move it all over here, but I have come to a decision to upload some of that writing here.  Rather than make you dig around, when/if I upload some thing old, I’ll alert you to it in a post, should you care to read.

Literature Carnival, Seventh Edition

Finally!  I apologize for the carnival’s long absence.  Hopefully we can get this thing back on a bi-weekly schedule now.  Because I have limited time (I have a lot of essays to grade this week), I am limiting this week’s carnival strictly to submissions I received.

The Library Girl discusses the joys of enjoying one’s favorite hot beverage along with a good read.  I heard there used to be apparently still is a good bookstore in Atlanta called the Cup and Chaucer.  I live about a mile away from Coffee Buy the Book.  There’s just something about a nice hot cup of coffee or tea that goes so well with reading.  I can almost feel my IQ points go up when I go inside a coffeehouse or tearoom.

Grrl Scientist of Living the Scientific Life (Scientist Interrupted) reviews Michael Ruse’s The Evolution-Creation Struggle.  Very interesting book review — I would like to recommend Ed Larson’s books on the subject, mainly because I’ve heard him speak and he didn’t win the Pulitzer for nothing.

I read Jacob I Have Loved by Katherine Paterson in college as part of a course in Young Adult literature.  It’s a wonderful book.  The Autumn Rain thinks so too — read her review “When the Angst is Worth the Beauty.”

I’m afraid those are all the submissions I received — all very good ones!  I encourage you to submit your literature-related entries to the carnival now that we’re back on track.  I believe I received two other submissions that didn’t come through properly due to problems with my form.  When I invited the authors to resubmit, I didn’t hear anything.

If you would like your blog post to be featured in the next Literature Carnival, please use my carnival submission form.  Hope to see you in the next edition!

Moving Lament

For reasons sometimes beyond my control, but mostly not, I’ve moved this blog around a heck of a lot.  It used to be on Upsaid, which was a very good host, but had limits as far as size.  What could be more limitless than one’s own domain?

Then I purchased planethuff.com, which exists now only as a redirect to my husband’s crime blog.  I do hope anyone who was still looking for me over there has figured out where I am.

Around October, I started feeling squeezed out of planethuff.com, and I moved all my writing over to the domain I had purchased for education, huffenglish.com.

When I migrated Much Madness to Word Press, I couldn’t make the switch work unless I changed the file name for the blog, so I moved huffenglish.com/dana over to huffenglish.com/muchmadness.

Finally, my former host screwed me over, and here we are — my own domain with my name in it and everything.  And I really like it.  Except all this moving around has made me too hard, I think, for some people to keep up with.  I tried to cover that base — I put up redirects and tried to e-mail people I knew read me most.

I don’t have any books on successful blogging, and frankly, this blog has never been what most people would define as successful.  That’s because I didn’t make it fit a niche.  It isn’t a crime blog or a book blog or a sex blog or a technology blog or an anything blog.  It’s just my ramblings, and most people (with the exception of friends, I guess) aren’t interested in that.

Don’t get me wrong.  I’m not complaining.  If this blog ever reached the popularity of Steve’s, I would be scratching my head, wondering what was wrong with these people and why they don’t have a life.  I’ve been writing online in some form or another, in different places, since late June 2001.  Sometimes I can’t believe it’s been that long.  Other times it seems like it’s been so much longer, mainly because my life is so different now.  In some ways, this blog has stood the test of time, because after all the roadblocks I’ve encountered in the nearly five years I’ve been writing, I still kept at it.  Most blogs last about four months.  A fairly surprising, but somewhat lesser number of blogs only last a day.  So I guess you could say that nearly five years isn’t bad.

Sometimes I wonder if I should count the years I kept an online diary.  After all, the entries are no longer accessible.  I don’t plan on uploading most of it here.  Anyone who read my old diary probably knows why.  When I left that place, I was attempting to shut a door on a painful part of my life.  But I still kept writing.  And the time I spent there wasn’t for nothing.  I learned a lot about writing online while I was there.  I suppose that’s why I count the time I spent there, even if you can’t read it.

Sometimes I go back and look at certain selections.  It is interesting, for example, to re-read my first reaction to 9/11.  I forget things, too, and sometimes re-reading is a sort of “Oh, yeah, I hadn’t thought about that in a while.”  It’s interesting to see how that journal evolved, too.  In many ways, this blog picked up where the old diary left off.  This blog actually hasn’t changed too much in the two years I’ve been keeping it.  I don’t know if that means I found a niche after all, or what.

Sometimes I feel I’ve spread myself too thin.  I have compartmentalized several interests of mine into different blogs.  I’m even considering another blog.  I can’t keep up, and I know it.  I do have a demanding full-time job and three children!

I really enjoy this, though.  Getting my thoughts out there.  Publishing.  Having some people respond.  It’s addictive.

Literature Carnival, Second Edition

I promise not to do this every time, but rather than focus on posts written within the last week, I decided to focus on posts written about a particular author. I chose Jane Austen. I suppose it’s because I read most of her books my first year teaching, and I love her sense of humor. I have been thinking over the last week that I’ll pick up Persuasion, which I never finished all those years ago when I read her other books.

First of all, I was surprised to learn that Ms. Austen blogs. Sort of. At any rate, you can learn about all things Austen and truly call yourself an F.O.J. if you regularly visit AustenBlog.

Neil Gaiman points his readers to a Jane Austen font. That’s funny; I’d never have pegged him for an F.O.J. Can’t tell I learned a new term, or anything, can you?

With a new version of Pride and Prejudice, Austen movies are being discussed a bit more than books. If you’ve seen the new movie, you’re aware of the not-quite-F.O.J. ending (OK, I promise, I’ll stop — perhaps Janeite?), but what you might not have heard is that even though the Jane Austen Society of North America hated it, it seems that men like it. Shocking.

There are five reasons why you should watch or read Austen if your marriage is going into the toilet. I personally like number two best.

Jen Rouse takes a look at Northanger Abbey.

Jane celebrated a birthday on December 16. You can read about it at Ready Steady Book, Ron Schuler’s Parlour Tricks, and happytrails!.

To submit literary blog posts for next week’s carnival, e-mail dana @ huffenglish.com with the subject line Carnival. Please include a link to the item and the category for which it should be considered. Deadline is 10:00 P.M. each Friday. And it doesn’t have to be about Jane Austen.

Soliciting Template Advice

I’m trying to decide whether or not to go with a bolder template I found. It reminded me instantly of Madama Butterfly, my favorite opera (but it isn’t as though I have been to lots).

I have created a test page for you to look at. It has my blog and sidebar as they would appear. I realize I need to make some tweaky changes (like fixing the search button). I also ditched the calendar function, so if you use that, it might be gone if I decide to go with the template.

View the test template, then come back and tell me what you think.