Linda Schrenko

Former State School Superintendent Linda Schrenko and two others were indicted today in an alleged scheme to steal more than $500,000 in federal education funds, using the money for campaign expenses and a face-lift.

Read the rest of the article at the AJC website.

To say I am disgusted and appalled is an understatement. Frankly, what I am is absolutely livid. I have long despised Linda Schrenko. I think most Georgia educators probably do. Now it becomes clear to all just how badly she abused her position as Superintendent of the Georgia Department of Education.

Want to know more details? Here is a timeline of events.

I want to know why. What made someone in her position, holding the purse-strings of education in a state that is struggling to bring up test scores and “leave no child behind,” do such a heinous thing to the students and teachers of Georgia?

You know what’s really disgusting? If she is found guilty, she will probably get a slap on the wrist. Damn it, I want her to be held accountable for her crimes, and I want to see her ass in jail.

I am anxious to see what Johnny Isakson thinks, as he was, I believe, Chairman of the Georgia BOE during Shrenko’s evil reign. I also wonder what Sonny Perdue will say, as she ran against him (and lost) for the GOP nomination for governor of Georgia in 2002.

More on the Braswell Case

Read the latest on the Braswell case here. If you regularly read this blog, you will remember I have mentioned this situation in several entries.

I have stated that I think Braswell may have been correct on some of her points. She alleges that she was not given due process. I agree to a point — once she issued the prepared statement singling out Jaclyn Steele in front of the squad, I think her rights to due process were forfeit. I cannot imagine saying or doing something similar when I was a public school teacher and expecting to keep my job.

I will continue to post updates on the case as they are available. Please continue to keep up with Braswell’s point of view at her husband’s website, www.helpmarilou.com. I agree with Matt Braswell on one issue: don’t ever look at just one side of the issue.

Marilou Braswell, Part 2

I have exchanged a few e-mails with Matt Braswell, Marilou Braswell’s husband. He has been kind and thoughtful, despite the fact that I posted my opinion about a news story that reflects negatively upon his wife. I commend him for that, because it isn’t easy to be that way when you’re in the line of fire, as he and his wife undoubtedly are. He seems like a decent person. To that end, I extended him the opportunity to share his story in this blog, unedited. He politely declined. I invite you to peruse his website, helpmarilou.com. In his own words, “I can only urge you to do your homework before believing anyone, including me.” All people should be so classy when they disagree. To that end, I encourage you to do your homework if this story has piqued your interest. I will be candid and say that I have read through the documents on the site, and while I think the Braswells have some valid points and may even be completely in the right about aspects of the case, my mind remains unchanged, primarily because of the “infamous prepared statement,” which, to their credit, they post in its entirety on their site. I want to underscore something I said before, that we need to follow the advice of Atticus Finch and walk around in someone else’s skin, consider things from their point of view. I think I can fairly say I’ve done that — I’ve read about this issue from both sides, and I’ve come to my own conclusion based on the evidence each side has provided.

The Scarlet Letter, or Jesus Loves You

Another short week as we wrap up the Jewish holidays (for now). We had a short week with Rosh Hashanah, a regular week with a half-day on Friday before Yom Kippur, a short week last week for Sukkot, and a short week this week for Shemini Atzeret and Simchat Torah. I have been able to get a lot of long-term planning done. I mean, I am on the ball. I know what I’m doing for basically a couple months down the road.

Because of the holidays, the students had long prayers (tefillah), which meant we missed classes. Today, I only taught one class (although it was a double block). It was a great class. We started off reading Jonathan Edwards’ fiery sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” which made those kids glad they’re not Puritan. I had the excellent opportunity to explain some Christian theology — not proselytize, mind. I don’t do that. It was to explain where these Puritans are coming from and what they believe. The students were very interested and asked great questions. We then discussed the first portion of The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne. I think once we started discussing it, they warmed to the book. Hester is really a pretty interesting old gal. Discussion of Puritan (and Christian) theology in general continued. We discussed a bit the ways in which religion is still a part of our laws, and it seemed like the discussion really took off. One student brought up Blue Laws, I mentioned the Ten Commandments and sodomy laws, and before you knew it, we were talking about how religion has impacted education and separation of church and state. I gave my opinion, as I’ve stated here recently, about the perfect appropriateness of requiring religious education when one goes to a religious institution, but the complete imappropriateness otherwise, and of course, there were no dissenters in that classroom. They have actually, most of them, been in a position of feeling uncomfortable about being the only Jew in a room full of Christians — of feeling like “the other.” One student shared a particularly appalling story with me.

She said she went to public school in the 5th grade. Her teacher sat her up front, near her desk. On the corner of her desk, she kept a copy of the New Testament and frequently offered to loan it to my student, should she be interested. She also frequently attempted to get her to borrow the Left Behind series books. Bleh. So my poor student felt very uncomfortable, but also afraid to say any thing lest the teacher hold it against her. In short, she was afraid it would affect her grade. Finally, it became unbearable, and my student went to the principal, who, from what I was told, handled the situation properly. But my, oh my. Can you believe it? Put yourself in someone else’s shoes, those of you who have ever been guilty of trying to force your relgious beliefs (or even lack thereof) on someone. What right have any of us to try to undermine what a parent is teaching his/her child about religion? Don’t we keep saying over and over that something like that is best left to the parents? Actually, it reminded me of a story I read recently in the Atlanta Jewish Times.

So this is why I wrote what I wrote about Marilou Braswell. I’ve had some negative feedback about it. No one who will leave a real name and valid e-mail. I got tired of it and closed comments on that entry. I figure that if someone really wants to tell me off, then they’ll just have to e-mail me. So far all anyone’s really done is basically tell me I’m wrong, that I don’t know the facts (I guess the news and UGA also got the facts wrong, if that’s the case), and insult people involved (Jaclyn Steele and someone named Demon Damon that I don’t even remember — and that was from an actual e-mail). Oh, and they shared with me that I can learn the truth of the matter at helpmarilou.com. I don’t want to be accused of not giving equal time, so check it out if you must, but please God, don’t tell them I sent you. The last thing I need is more anti-Semitic evangelicals telling me I’m wrong, Jaclyn’s going to hell, and I’m disseminating lies for the uneducated masses who, you know, all rely on me for their information, and all that crap.

Actually, I had a great day. I really did.

Controversy

I will be very glad when the controversy with the UGA cheerleading coach, Marilou Braswell, and the cheerleader, Jaclyn Steele (who is blamed for Braswell’s removal as coach) dies down. I stand by what I wrote in a previous entry, but at the same time, I’m tired of seeing so many hits for it in my statistics. I don’t know why, but it bothers me. I feel as if there are strangers coming here — strangers who know nothing about my circumstances — just to gape at my opinion about one single event in the news and judge me for my opinion on that one thing. I refuse to delete the entry, because, as I said, I stand by it. And it feels cowardly.

Move along folks. Nothing to see here.

Eleven Educators Will Lose State Licenses

I searched through my entries, and I cannot find a reference to the Georgia teachers who will lose their licenses because they bought bogus advanced degrees online (free registration required). How could I have been so remiss in not telling you, gentle reader, all about this unbelievable example of a severe dearth of ethics in my profession?

What basically happened is that these teachers, who were mostly middle school teachers, many of whom worked in my former system, bought masters and doctorates from a diploma mill known as St. Regis University located in Liberia. None of the teachers was known to me, nor did they work at my former school. The Georgia Professional Standards Commission voted nearly unanimously (11-1) to revoke their teaching certificates. Without a teaching certificate, no public school is able to hire them to teach. I would be very surprised if a private school did, either, considering the circumstances. I doubt they would be able to move elsewhere and be certified. Should they lie, I am unsure what recourse the injured school would have. I have been told that someone who lies on a job application for a public school system can have action taken against their certificate. If you have no certificate, though, perhaps some sort of criminal charge of fraud or something of the sort could be made.

When teachers complete an approved education plan at an approved/accredited university, like I did, and have passed a certification test (or two, as is now required), we are eligible to apply to the GAPSC for a teaching certificate. Every five years, we must submit proof that we have taken college coursework or professional development courses as required to keep our knowledge of the art of teaching and our subject matter current. When we complete advanced degrees, we submit the information in much the same way, although we are not required to take further tests. The GAPSC then decides whether or not to grant us a certificate at a higher level. Mine is, for example, a T-4, which means I have a bachelor’s degree. Someone with a master’s degree might hold a T-5 certificate. Someone with a specialist’s degree would hold a T-6. A person with a doctorate would have a T-7. Leadership degrees are the same, but they are listed as L-6 or L-7. I’m not sure if you can have an L-5. Pay goes up as your degree level advances.

Basically what these people did was to sacrifice their careers in education for monetary gain. I guess we all get into teaching for the big bucks, don’t we? Granted, I believe teachers are not paid enough, but I find it appalling that my colleagues would feel it is okay to defraud their school system, their students, their students’ parents, and the state of Georgia into thinking they had earned an advanced degree. Advanced degrees are a badge of honor. They represent hard work. They represent specialist knowledge. I’m happy that this case demonstrated that those things cannot be bought.

You can still work in private schools in Georgia without a certificate. And you can work in other industries, too. But I can’t think of an employer who would, in good conscience, hire someone who had done this. I’m sure it was tempting. It looked so easy. And why do the work if you can get away with not doing it? What a lesson to teach one’s students.

Even though this effectively ends the careers of these educators, and might seriously damage their prospects in another field, I think it was important that the GAPSC took the hard line and did not allow this travesty to be punished lightly. I agree with their finding that purchasing these degrees “and using them to obtain raises violated ethics rules on misrepresentation or falsification, misuse of public funds and property, criminal acts and professional conduct.”

A Ben Hill County parent said of David Mims, a principal who bought a phony degree from St. Regis: “‘The stars get doctorates for not even going to college, stuff they have not done. If he has been doing fine with our children let him be,’ says parent Elaine Hubbert.” It is much more complicated than that. This parent clearly doesn’t understand the difference between an honorary doctorate and a real one. Lots of people with no degree at all might have all the makings of being an excellent teacher and a way with kids, but you learn things to further your expertise when you get a degree. Ultimately, the measure of it is this: do you want a liar and a fraud teaching your child? I would hope the answer is “no.” It’s a pity that these eleven educators didn’t ask themselves that question before they bought those phony degrees.

Reading

If you were not aware, the Patriot Act gives federal agents the right to search your library records. The ALA would like to do something about that. If you are interesting in seeing section 215 of the Patriot Act amended, visit the Campaign for Reader Privacy.

Then again, maybe the government need not worry that we’re reading subversive material. A recent survey, “Reading at Risk,” found that “fewer than half of Americans over 18 now read novels, short stories, plays or poetry; that the consumer pool for books of all kinds has diminished; and that the pace at which the nation is losing readers, especially young readers, is quickening.” This may not be a surprise to many teachers. Should we be alarmed by this? Since it impacts my livelihood, I have to say yes, but I know not everyone might agree. “In fact, the study has already produced conflicting reactions.” From an article in the New York Times:

“It’s not just unfortunate, it’s real cause for concern,” said James Shapiro, a professor of English at Columbia University. “A culture gets what it pays for, and if we think democracy depends on people who read, write, think and reflect — which is what literature advances — then we have to invest in what it takes to promote that.”

On the other hand Kevin Starr, librarian emeritus for the state of California and a professor of history at the University of Southern California, said that if close to 50 percent of Americans are reading literature, “that’s not bad, actually.”

“In an age where there’s no canon, where there are so many other forms of information, and where we’re returning to medieval-like oral culture based on television,” he said, “I think that’s pretty impressive, quite frankly.” Mr. Starr continued: “We should be alarmed, I suppose, but the horse has long since run out of the barn. There are two distinct cultures that have evolved, and by far the smaller is the one that’s tied up with book and high culture. You can get through American life and be very successful without anybody ever asking you whether Shylock is an anti-Semitic character or whether ‘Death in Venice’ is better than ‘The Magic Mountain.'”

You can read the entire article here (free registration required): http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/books/08READ.html. I know registering is a pain, but I really think you should read the article if this issue concerns you. If you are no longer able to access the article for free, please let me know.

Andrew Solomon wrote an excellent editorial explaining why reading and literature are vital, but the New York Times will not allow you to view it for free. However, you are fortunate that I found Roger Darlington was good enough to reproduce it in his weblog. Please visit his blog, read the editorial, and thank him for reproducing such an important piece of writing.